No signature of the birth environment of exoplanets from their host stars' Mahalanobis phase space

TL;DR

This study investigates whether the birth environment of stars influences the presence of exoplanets by analyzing their phase space, concluding that stellar kinematics are more related to age than to dynamical interactions in star-forming regions.

Contribution

The paper provides evidence that the phase space of planet-hosting stars is primarily influenced by stellar age rather than dynamical encounters during star formation.

Findings

Stars retaining planets have higher phase space regardless of initial density.

High phase space in host stars is linked to younger stellar ages.

Dynamical encounters do not significantly alter the phase space of planet-hosting stars.

Abstract

The architectures of extrasolar planetary systems often deviate considerably from the ``standard" model for planet formation, which is largely based on our own Solar System. In particular, gas giants on close orbits are not predicted by planet formation theory and so some process(es) are thought to move the planets closer to their host stars. Recent research has suggested that Hot Jupiter host stars display a different phase space compared to stars that do not host Hot Jupiters. This has been attributed to these stars forming in star-forming regions of high stellar density, where dynamical interactions with passing stars have perturbed the planets. We test this hypothesis by quantifying the phase space of planet-hosting stars in dynamical N-body simulations of star-forming regions. We find that stars that retain their planets have a higher phase space than non-hosts, regardless of their initial physical density. This is because an imprint of the kinematic substructure from the regions birth is retained, as these stars have experienced fewer and less disruptive encounters than stars whose planets have been liberated and become free-floating. However, host stars whose planets remain bound but have had their orbits significantly altered by dynamical encounters are also primarily found in high phase space regimes. We therefore corroborate other research in this area which has suggested the high phase space of Hot Jupiter host stars is not caused by dynamical encounters or stellar clustering, but rather reflects an age bias in that these stars are (kinematically) younger than other exoplanet host stars.