Investigating the Impact of Choice on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Space Controls
Nathaniel Hamilton, Kyle Dunlap, and Kerianne L. Hobbs

TL;DR
This paper examines how the number of discrete choices in reinforcement learning affects the performance of space control tasks, finding that limited choices excel in inspection tasks while continuous control is better for docking.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of discrete versus continuous action spaces in RL for space control tasks, highlighting task-dependent optimal control strategies.
Findings
Limited discrete choices optimize inspection task performance.
Continuous control yields better results for docking tasks.
Task-specific control strategies improve space autonomous operations.
Abstract
For many space applications, traditional control methods are often used during operation. However, as the number of space assets continues to grow, autonomous operation can enable rapid development of control methods for different space related tasks. One method of developing autonomous control is Reinforcement Learning (RL), which has become increasingly popular after demonstrating promising performance and success across many complex tasks. While it is common for RL agents to learn bounded continuous control values, this may not be realistic or practical for many space tasks that traditionally prefer an on/off approach for control. This paper analyzes using discrete action spaces, where the agent must choose from a predefined list of actions. The experiments explore how the number of choices provided to the agents affects their measured performance during and after training. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
