Constraining the helium-to-metal enrichment ratio $\Delta Y/\Delta Z$ from main sequence binary stars. Theoretical analysis of the accuracy and precision of the age and helium abundance estimates
G. Valle, M. Dell'Omodarme, P.G. Prada Moroni, S. Degl'Innocenti

TL;DR
This study assesses the potential to accurately determine the helium-to-metal enrichment ratio from binary star observations, revealing significant challenges due to observational uncertainties affecting the parameter's estimation.
Contribution
The paper provides a theoretical analysis showing the limitations and biases in estimating $ abla Y/ abla Z$ from binary star data under realistic observational errors.
Findings
Posterior distributions of $ abla Y/ abla Z$ are biased towards parameter bounds.
Systematic errors in temperature and metallicity hinder accurate $ abla Y/ abla Z$ estimation.
Age estimates remain unbiased with 10% precision despite biases in $ abla Y/ abla Z$.
Abstract
We investigated the theoretical possibility of accurately determining the helium-to-metal enrichment ratio from precise observations of double lined eclipsing binary systems. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we drew synthetic binary systems with masses between 0.85 and 1.00 from a grid of stellar models with [...]. Subsequently, a broader grid with from 1.0 to 3.0 was used in the fitting process. To account for observational uncertainties, two scenarios were explored: S1 with realistic uncertainties of 100 K in temperature and 0.1 dex in [Fe/H], and S2 with halved uncertainties. We repeated the simulation at two baseline metallicities: [Fe/H] = 0.0 and -0.3. The posterior distributions of were severely biased towards the edge of the allowable range in the S1 errors scenario. The situation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
