Understanding the ultraspherical spectral method
Lu Cheng, Kuan Xu

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the ultraspherical spectral method, explaining its error sources, condition number, and why certain errors decay below machine epsilon, providing insights into its high accuracy and reliability.
Contribution
It identifies the sources of error and derives the effective condition number of the ultraspherical spectral method, clarifying its numerical stability and error behavior.
Findings
Effective condition number explains backward error stability.
Cauchy error can decay below machine epsilon, misleading convergence.
Analysis extends to other spectral methods and PDE solutions.
Abstract
The ultraspherical spectral method features high accuracy and fast solution. In this article, we determine the sources of error arising from the ultraspherical spectral method and derive its effective condition number, which explains why its backward error is consistent with a numerical method with bounded condition number. In addition, we show the cause for the Cauchy error to go below the machine epsilon and decay eventually to exact zero, revealing the fact that the Cauchy error can be misleading when used as an indicator of convergence and accuracy. The analysis in this work can be readily extended to other spectral methods, when applicable, and to the solution of PDEs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical methods in inverse problems · Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis · Scientific Research and Discoveries
