Impact Analysis of the Chesa Boudin Administration
Jordan G. Taqi-Eddin

TL;DR
This study empirically evaluates the impact of Chesa Boudin's tenure as San Francisco district attorney, revealing significant reductions in prosecutions and convictions, and increased case diversions, using regression discontinuity design.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical analysis of Boudin's policies, employing regression discontinuity and machine learning to assess their effects on prosecution and crime levels.
Findings
36% reduction in prosecutions for all crimes
58% increase in successful case diversions
Potential for machine learning to improve estimation precision
Abstract
Claims of soft-handed prosecutorial policies and increases in crime were precipitating factors in the removal of Chesa Boudin as district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco. However, little research has been conducted to empirically investigate the veracity of these indictments on the former district attorney. Using regression discontinuity design (RDD), I find that the Boudin administration led to a 36\% and 21\% reduction in monthly prosecutions and convictions respectively for all crimes. Moreover, his tenure increased monthly successful case diversions by 58\%. When only looking at violent crimes during this period, the SFDA's office saw a 36\% decrease, 7\% decrease, and 47\% increase in monthly prosecutions, convictions, and successful case diversions respectively. Although, the decrease in monthly convictions was not statistically significant for the violent crimes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgriculture and Rural Development Research
