On the Euler function of linearly recurrence sequences
Florian Luca, Makoko Campbell Manape

TL;DR
This paper proves that for most integers n, the Euler function of the absolute value of a nondegenerate linearly recurrent sequence exceeds the sequence value at the Euler function of n, with the failure set being very sparse.
Contribution
It establishes a new inequality relating Euler functions and linearly recurrent sequences, showing it holds for almost all n with a very small exceptional set.
Findings
The inequality holds for a set of positive integers with density 1.
The set where the inequality fails has size O(x / log x).
The result applies to nondegenerate sequences not polynomial in n.
Abstract
In this paper, we show that if is any nondegenerate linearly recurrent sequence of integers whose general term is up to sign not a polynomial in , then the inequality holds on a set of positive integers of density , where is the Euler function. In fact, we show that the set of for which the above inequality fails has counting function .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
