Artificial Greenhouse Gases as Exoplanet Technosignatures
Edward W. Schwieterman, Thomas J. Fauchez, Jacob Haqq-Misra, Ravi K., Kopparapu, Daniel Angerhausen, Daria Pidhorodetska, Michaela Leung, Evan L., Sneed, Elsa Ducrot

TL;DR
This paper explores the detectability of artificial greenhouse gases as potential technosignatures on exoplanets, proposing that their spectral signatures could indicate extraterrestrial technological activity or terraforming efforts.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of artificial greenhouse gases as technosignatures and calculates their detectability using JWST and future missions, highlighting their potential as indicators of extraterrestrial intelligence.
Findings
Artificial greenhouse gases produce detectable mid-IR signatures.
Detection of 1-100 ppm gases is feasible within a few transits.
These gases are more detectable than standard biosignatures at similar concentrations.
Abstract
Atmospheric pollutants such as CFCs and NO have been proposed as potential remotely detectable atmospheric technosignature gases. Here we investigate the potential for artificial greenhouse gases including CF, CF, CF, SF, and NF to generate detectable atmospheric signatures. In contrast to passive incidental byproducts of industrial processes, artificial greenhouse gases would represent an intentional effort to change the climate of a planet with long-lived, low toxicity gases and would possess low false positive potential. An extraterrestrial civilization may be motivated to undertake such an effort to arrest a predicted snowball state on their home world or to terraform an otherwise uninhabitable terrestrial planet within their system. Because artificial greenhouse gases strongly absorb in the thermal mid-infrared window of temperate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
