Overcoming Medical Overuse with AI Assistance: An Experimental Investigation
Ziyi Wang, Lijia Wei, and Lian Xue

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that AI assistance can significantly reduce unnecessary medical treatments and improve diagnostic accuracy among medical students, especially under incentive schemes aligned with patient and physician interests.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence on AI's effectiveness in reducing medical overtreatment and explores how different incentive schemes influence AI adoption and outcomes.
Findings
AI reduced overtreatment by up to 62% in certain incentive conditions
Diagnostic accuracy improved by 17% to 37% with AI assistance
Approximately half of participants adopted AI advice in decision-making
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in mitigating medical overtreatment, a significant issue characterized by unnecessary interventions that inflate healthcare costs and pose risks to patients. We conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment at a medical school, utilizing a novel medical prescription task, manipulating monetary incentives and the availability of AI assistance among medical students using a three-by-two factorial design. We tested three incentive schemes: Flat (constant pay regardless of treatment quantity), Progressive (pay increases with the number of treatments), and Regressive (penalties for overtreatment) to assess their influence on the adoption and effectiveness of AI assistance. Our findings demonstrate that AI significantly reduced overtreatment rates by up to 62% in the Regressive incentive conditions where (prospective) physician…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
