KiDS-1000 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology from peak count statistics

TL;DR

This paper uses peak count statistics from KiDS-1000 data to constrain cosmological parameters, achieving results consistent with previous surveys and Planck, and providing one of the tightest constraints on structure growth.

Contribution

It introduces a novel analysis of peak count statistics in aperture mass maps for KiDS-1000, extending cosmological constraints beyond traditional two-point statistics.

Findings

Constraints on $oldsymbol{oldsymbol{ ext{Sigma}_8}}$ and $oldsymbol{A_{ m IA}}$ consistent with previous results.

Joint analysis with DES-Y1 improves parameter constraints and aligns with Planck results.

Results robust against modeling choices and different data selections.

Abstract

We analyse the fourth data release of the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) and extract cosmological parameter constraints based on the cosmic shear peak count statistics. Peaks are identified in aperture mass maps in which the filter is maximally sensitive to angular scales in the range 2-4arcmin, probing deep into the non-linear regime of structure formation. We interpret our results with a simulation-based inference pipeline, sampling over a broad $w$CDM prior volume and marginalising over uncertainties on shape calibration, photometric redshift distribution, intrinsic alignment and baryonic feedback. Our measurements constrain the structure growth parameter and the amplitude of the non-linear intrinsic alignment model to $\Sigma_8 \equiv \sigma_8\left[\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3\right]^{0.60}=0.765^{+0.030}_{-0.030}$ and $A_{\rm IA}= 0.71^{+0.42}_{-0.42}$, respectively, in agreement with previous KiDS-1000 results based on two-point shear statistics. These results are robust against modelling of the non-linear physics, different scale cuts and selections of tomographic bins. The posterior is also consistent with that from the Dark Energy Survey Year-1 peak count analysis presented in Harnois-D\'eraps et al (2021), and hence we jointly analyse both surveys. We obtain $\Sigma_8^{\rm joint} \equiv \sigma_8\left[\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3\right]^{0.57}=0.759^{+0.020}_{-0.017}$, in agreement with the Planck $w$CDM results. The shear-CMB tension on this parameter increases to $3.1\sigma$ when forcing $w=-1.0$, and to $4.1\sigma$ if comparing instead with $S_{8,\Lambda{\rm CDM}}^{\rm joint} = 0.736^{+0.016}_{-0.018}$, one of the tightest constraints to date on this quantity. (abridged)