TL;DR
This paper explores how user preference changes over time influence the calibration of recommender systems, highlighting the importance of considering preference dynamics for more accurate and user-aligned recommendations.
Contribution
It introduces a granular, time-sensitive approach to calibration that accounts for evolving user preferences, challenging the static assumption in traditional methods.
Findings
Preference dynamics significantly impact calibration accuracy.
Recent user interactions are more relevant for calibration.
Different domains exhibit distinct preference evolution patterns.
Abstract
Calibration in recommender systems is an important performance criterion that ensures consistency between the distribution of user preference categories and that of recommendations generated by the system. Standard methods for mitigating miscalibration typically assume that user preference profiles are static, and they measure calibration relative to the full history of user's interactions, including possibly outdated and stale preference categories. We conjecture that this approach can lead to recommendations that, while appearing calibrated, in fact, distort users' true preferences. In this paper, we conduct a preliminary investigation of recommendation calibration at a more granular level, taking into account evolving user preferences. By analyzing differently sized training time windows from the most recent interactions to the oldest, we identify the most relevant segment of user's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
