Comprehensive Causal Machine Learning
Michael Lechner, Jana Mareckova

TL;DR
This paper compares three comprehensive machine learning methods for causal effect estimation across different levels of granularity, highlighting their theoretical properties, strengths, and practical advantages in various scenarios.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of mcf, grf, and dml approaches, including proven guarantees for mcf and insights into their performance under different conditions.
Findings
dml excels for population and group average effects with few groups
outcome-centred forests outperform for detailed causal heterogeneity
mcf is most robust when selection into treatment is strong and offers internal consistency
Abstract
Uncovering causal effects in multiple treatment setting at various levels of granularity provides substantial value to decision makers. Comprehensive machine learning approaches to causal effect estimation allow to use a single causal machine learning approach for estimation and inference of causal mean effects for all levels of granularity. Focusing on selection-on-observables, this paper compares three such approaches, the modified causal forest (mcf), the generalized random forest (grf), and double machine learning (dml). It also compares the theoretical properties of the approaches and provides proven theoretical guarantees for the mcf. The findings indicate that dml-based methods excel for average treatment effects at the population level (ATE) and group level (GATE) with few groups, when selection into treatment is not too strong. However, for finer causal heterogeneity,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems
