Discussing Risks and Benefits in the Future of Hybrid Rehabilitation and Fitness in Mixed Reality
Jana Franceska Funke, Enrico Rukzio

TL;DR
This paper explores the potential risks and benefits of using mixed reality technologies in future hybrid rehabilitation and fitness, emphasizing improved feedback and guidance for physical activities at home.
Contribution
It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of mixed reality in health and rehabilitation, proposing enhanced feedback mechanisms using virtual reality and motion tracking.
Findings
Mixed reality can enhance feedback and guidance in rehabilitation.
Sedentary behavior increases risks in remote fitness.
Mixed reality offers immersive environments for health interventions.
Abstract
In a world where in-person context transitions more into remote and hybrid concepts, we should consider new concepts of interaction in health and rehabilitation and what advantages and disadvantages they bring. One of the rising topics is mixed reality, where we can use the advantages of immersive 3D, 360-degree environments. Meanwhile, physical activity is further decreasing and with it negative effects increase through sedentary behaviour or wrong and untrained movements. In this position paper, we discuss these new risks and potential benefits of mixed reality technology when used for rehabilitation and fitness. We conclude with suggesting better feedback and guidance for physical movement and tasks at home. Improving feedback and guidance for participants could be achieved through using new technologies like virtual reality and motion tracking.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
