End-to-end Optimization of Optical Communication Systems based on Directly Modulated Lasers

TL;DR

This paper introduces a comprehensive end-to-end optimization method for directly modulated laser systems in optical communications, jointly optimizing laser parameters, modulation, and equalization to enhance data throughput.

Contribution

It presents a novel joint optimization framework that includes laser bias and modulation current, improving system performance over traditional separate or fixed-parameter methods.

Findings

Joint optimization outperforms benchmark approaches across tested symbol rates.

Inclusion of laser bias and peak-to-peak current in optimization improves data throughput.

Differentiable modeling simplifies gradient calculation for end-to-end training.

Abstract

The use of directly modulated lasers (DMLs) is attractive in low-power, cost-constrained short-reach optical links. However, their limited modulation bandwidth can induce waveform distortion, undermining their data throughput. Traditional distortion mitigation techniques have relied mainly on the separate training of transmitter-side pre-distortion and receiver-side equalization. This approach overlooks the potential gains obtained by simultaneous optimization of transmitter (constellation and pulse shaping) and receiver (equalization and symbol demapping). Moreover, in the context of DML operation, the choice of laser-driving configuration parameters such as the bias current and peak-to-peak modulation current has a significant impact on system performance. We propose a novel end-to-end optimization approach for DML systems, incorporating the learning of bias and peak-to-peak modulation current to the optimization of constellation points, pulse shaping and equalization. The simulation of the DML dynamics is based on the use of the laser rate equations at symbol rates between 15 and 25 Gbaud. The resulting output sequences from the rate equations are used to build a differentiable data-driven model, simplifying the calculation of gradients needed for end-to-end optimization. The proposed end-to-end approach is compared to 3 additional benchmark approaches: the uncompensated system without equalization, a receiver-side finite impulse response equalization approach and an end-to-end approach with learnable pulse shape and nonlinear Volterra equalization but fixed bias and peak-to-peak modulation current. The numerical simulations on the four approaches show that the joint optimization of bias, peak-to-peak current, constellation points, pulse shaping and equalization outperforms all other approaches throughout the tested symbol rates.