Cost-Benefit Analysis using Modular Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulations for Condition-based Maintenance of Unmanned Systems

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel cost-benefit analysis method for evaluating condition-based maintenance strategies in unmanned systems, using modular fault tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to assess ROI and maintenance impacts.

Contribution

It presents the first approach to conduct a cost-benefit analysis for CBM in unmanned systems, integrating modular fault trees with Monte Carlo simulations for detailed ROI assessment.

Findings

Different CBM strategies significantly affect maintenance costs and ROI.

The method effectively evaluates trade-offs between investment costs and maintenance savings.

Application to an unmanned surface vessel demonstrates practical utility.

Abstract

Recent developments in condition-based maintenance (CBM) have helped make it a promising approach to maintenance cost avoidance in engineering systems. By performing maintenance based on conditions of the component with regards to failure or time, there is potential to avoid the large costs of system shutdown and maintenance delays. However, CBM requires a large investment cost compared to other available maintenance strategies. The investment cost is required for research, development, and implementation. Despite the potential to avoid significant maintenance costs, the large investment cost of CBM makes decision makers hesitant to implement. This study is the first in the literature that attempts to address the problem of conducting a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for implementing CBM concepts for unmanned systems. This paper proposes a method for conducting a CBA to determine the return on investment (ROI) of potential CBM strategies. The CBA seeks to compare different CBM strategies based on the differences in the various maintenance requirements associated with maintaining a multi-component, unmanned system. The proposed method uses modular dynamic fault tree analysis (MDFTA) with Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to assess the various maintenance requirements. The proposed method is demonstrated on an unmanned surface vessel (USV) example taken from the literature that consists of 5 subsystems and 71 components. Following this USV example, it is found that selecting different combinations of components for a CBM strategy can have a significant impact on maintenance requirements and ROI by impacting cost avoidances and investment costs.