Size and kinematics of the CIV broad emission line region from microlensing-induced line profile distortions in two gravitationally lensed quasars
Damien Hutsem\'ekers, Dominique Sluse, {\DJ}or{\dj}e Savi\'c

TL;DR
This study uses microlensing-induced line profile distortions in two gravitationally lensed quasars to estimate the size of the CIV broad emission line region, supporting the radius-luminosity relation but suggesting possible systematic differences.
Contribution
It demonstrates that simple BLR models can reproduce microlensing effects and provides new size estimates for the CIV BLR in two quasars, extending the microlensing radius-luminosity relation.
Findings
CIV BLR sizes are consistent with reverberation mapping relations.
Disk models better explain the microlensing distortions.
Estimated BLR radii are systematically smaller than reverberation mapping predictions.
Abstract
We analyzed the CIV line profile distortions due to microlensing in two quasars, J1339 and J1138. J1339 shows a strong, asymmetric line profile deformation, while J1138 shows a more modest, symmetric deformation. To probe the CIV broad line region (BLR), we compared the observed line profile deformations to simulated ones. The simulations are based on three simple BLR models, a Keplerian disk (KD), an equatorial wind (EW), and a polar wind (PW), of various sizes, inclinations, and emissivities. We find that the line profile deformations can be reproduced with the simple BLR models under consideration, with no need for more complex geometries or kinematics. The models with disk geometries (KD and EW) are preferred, while the PW model is definitely less likely. For J1339, we find the CIV BLR half-light radii to be 5.1 light-days and 6.7…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
