Symmetric-Difference (Degeneracy) and Signed Tree Models
\'Edouard Bonnet, Julien Duron, John Sylvester, Viktor Zamaraev

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of symmetric-difference degeneracy (sd-degeneracy) for graphs, explores its properties, and develops efficient adjacency labeling schemes for classes of graphs with bounded sd-degeneracy, extending existing models.
Contribution
It defines sd-degeneracy as a new graph parameter, analyzes its properties, and provides optimal adjacency labeling schemes for graphs with bounded sd-degeneracy, including signed tree models.
Findings
sd-degeneracy extends graph degeneracy and flip-width
Optimal $ ilde{O}( oot{2} n)$-bit adjacency labeling schemes are devised
Deciding sd-degeneracy bounds is NP- and co-NP-complete
Abstract
We introduce a dense counterpart of graph degeneracy, which extends the recently-proposed invariant symmetric difference. We say that a graph has sd-degeneracy (for symmetric-difference degeneracy) at most if it admits an elimination order of its vertices where a vertex can be removed whenever it has a -twin, i.e., another vertex such that at most vertices outside are neighbors of exactly one of . The family of graph classes of bounded sd-degeneracy is a superset of that of graph classes of bounded degeneracy or of bounded flip-width, and more generally, of bounded symmetric difference. Unlike most graph parameters, sd-degeneracy is not hereditary: it may be strictly smaller on a graph than on some of its induced subgraphs. In particular, every -vertex graph is an induced subgraph of some -vertex graph of sd-degeneracy 1. In spite of this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
