ASP-Completeness of Hamiltonicity in Grid Graphs, with Applications to Loop Puzzles
MIT Hardness Group, Josh Brunner, Lily Chung, Erik D. Demaine, Jenny Diomidova, Della Hendrickson, Andy Tockman

TL;DR
This paper proves ASP-completeness of Hamiltonicity in degree-3 grid graphs, enabling the ASP-completeness proof of 38 loop puzzles, many of which were previously not known to be NP-hard.
Contribution
It introduces a new
Findings
Hamiltonicity in degree-3 grid graphs is ASP-complete.
ASP-completeness of 38 loop puzzles is established, including 14 previously not known to be NP-hard.
Develops a stronger
Abstract
We prove that Hamiltonicity in maximum-degree-3 grid graphs (directed or undirected) is ASP-complete, i.e., it has a parsimonious reduction from every NP search problem (including a polynomial-time bijection between solutions). As a consequence, given k Hamiltonian cycles, it is NP-complete to find another; and counting Hamiltonian cycles is #P-complete. If we require the grid graph's vertices to form a full rectangle, then we show that Hamiltonicity remains ASP-complete if the edges are directed or if we allow removing some edges (whereas including all undirected edges is known to be easy). These results enable us to develop a stronger "T-metacell" framework for proving ASP-completeness of rectangular puzzles, which requires building just a single gadget representing a degree-3 grid-graph vertex. We apply this general theory to prove ASP-completeness of 38 pencil-and-paper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
