Is addition definable from multiplication and successor?
Friedrich Wehrung (UNICAEN)

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether certain ring homomorphisms that preserve addition and multiplication are necessarily additive, establishing conditions under which additivity follows in various algebraic structures.
Contribution
The paper proves that brachymorphisms are additive in many classes of rings, including matrix rings, Artinian rings, and rings with specific element decompositions, extending understanding of ring homomorphisms.
Findings
Brachymorphisms are additive in finite and Artinian rings.
Additivity holds for matrix rings over commutative rings.
Power functions and determinants are additive under specified conditions.
Abstract
A map between (associative, unital, but not necessarily commutative) rings is a\emph{brachymorphism} if and whenever . We tackle the problem whether every brachymorphism is additive (i.e., ), showing that in many contexts, including the following, the answer is positive: is finite (or, more generally, is left or right Artinian); is any ring of matrices over a commutative ring; is Engelian; every element of is a sum of -regular and central elements (this applies to -regular rings, Banach algebras, and power series rings); is the full matrix ring of order greater than over any ring; is the monoid ring for a commutative ring and a -regular monoid ; is the Weyl algebra over a commutative ring with positive characteristic; …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
