Conformalized Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Lena Podina, Mahdi Torabi Rad, Mohammad Kohandel

TL;DR
This paper introduces Conformalized PINNs (C-PINNs), a method that quantifies uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks using conformal prediction, providing valid uncertainty intervals without strong assumptions or high computational costs.
Contribution
The paper presents C-PINNs, a novel approach that applies conformal prediction to PINNs, enabling distribution-free, finite-sample uncertainty quantification.
Findings
Provides valid uncertainty intervals for PINNs without additional assumptions
Achieves finite-sample statistical validity in uncertainty quantification
Offers a computationally efficient alternative to ensemble and Bayesian methods
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are an influential method of solving differential equations and estimating their parameters given data. However, since they make use of neural networks, they provide only a point estimate of differential equation parameters, as well as the solution at any given point, without any measure of uncertainty. Ensemble and Bayesian methods have been previously applied to quantify the uncertainty of PINNs, but these methods may require making strong assumptions on the data-generating process, and can be computationally expensive. Here, we introduce Conformalized PINNs (C-PINNs) that, without making any additional assumptions, utilize the framework of conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of PINNs by providing intervals that have finite-sample, distribution-free statistical validity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications
