Examining Humanness as a Metaphor to Design Voice User Interfaces
Smit Desai, Mateusz Dubiel, Luis A. Leiva

TL;DR
This study investigates how human and non-human metaphors in voice user interfaces affect user perceptions and engagement, revealing context-dependent preferences and the influence of metaphor awareness on adoption intentions.
Contribution
It introduces an empirical comparison of human versus non-human metaphors in VUI design across health and finance domains, highlighting context-specific effects and design considerations.
Findings
Users prefer human metaphors in health contexts for enjoyability.
No significant perception difference in finance between metaphors.
Awareness of metaphor use influences user adoption preferences.
Abstract
Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) increasingly leverage 'humanness' as a foundational design metaphor, adopting roles like 'assistants,' 'teachers,' and 'secretaries' to foster natural interactions. Yet, this approach can sometimes misalign user trust and reinforce societal stereotypes, leading to socio-technical challenges that might impede long-term engagement. This paper explores an alternative approach to navigate these challenges-incorporating non-human metaphors in VUI design. We report on a study with 240 participants examining the effects of human versus non-human metaphors on user perceptions within health and finance domains. Results indicate a preference for the human metaphor (doctor) over the non-human (health encyclopedia) in health contexts for its perceived enjoyability and likeability. In finance, however, user perceptions do not significantly differ between human (financial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech and dialogue systems · Digital Communication and Language
