Hubble tension tomography: BAO vs SnIa distance tension
Dimitrios Bousis, Leandros Perivolaropoulos

TL;DR
This study examines the redshift dependence of the Hubble tension by comparing BAO and SnIa distances, revealing discrepancies at low redshifts and potential deviations from the standard cosmological model at high redshifts.
Contribution
It introduces a redshift tomography approach to analyze the Hubble tension and explores the need for re-evaluating distance calibration methods and potential high-redshift deviations.
Findings
Discrepancies between BAO and SnIa distances across redshifts.
Tension reduces at higher redshifts, indicating possible evolution of H0.
Hints of deviation from Planck18/$\\Lambda$CDM at $z\gtrsim 2$.
Abstract
We investigate the redshift dependence of the Hubble tension by comparing the luminosity distances obtained using an up-to-date BAO dataset (including the latest DESI data) calibrated with the CMB-inferred sound horizon, and the Pantheon+ SnIa distances calibrated with Cepheids. Using a redshift tomography method, we find: 1) The BAO-inferred distances are discrepant with the Pantheon+ SnIa distances across all redshift bins considered, with the discrepancy level varying with redshift. 2) The distance discrepancy is more pronounced at lower redshifts () compared to higher redshifts (). The consistency of CDM best fit parameters obtained in high and low redshift bins of both BAO and SnIa samples is investigated and we confirm that the tension reduces at high redshifts. Also a mild tension between the redshift bins is identified at higher…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
