Towards a Path Dependent Account of Category Fluency
David Heineman, Reba Koenen, Sashank Varma

TL;DR
This paper investigates the mechanisms behind category fluency, comparing models based on optimal foraging and semantic network sampling, and introduces sequence-based evaluation to better understand human-like retrieval behavior.
Contribution
It reformulates existing models as sequence generators, incorporates large language models, and proposes a new metric for comparing generated sequences to human data, resolving previous conflicting accounts.
Findings
Biases improve sequence generation quality
Global cues are necessary for patch switching
Deterministic search better replicates human behavior
Abstract
Category fluency is a widely studied cognitive phenomenon, yet two conflicting accounts have been proposed as the underlying retrieval mechanism -- an optimal foraging process deliberately searching through memory (Hills et al., 2012) and a random walk sampling from a semantic network (Abbott et al., 2015). Evidence for both accounts has centered around predicting human patch switches, where both existing models of category fluency produce paradoxically identical results. We begin by peeling back the assumptions made by existing models, namely that each named example only depends on the previous example, by (i) adding an additional bias to model the category transition probability directly and (ii) relying on a large language model to predict based on the entire existing sequence. Then, we present evidence towards resolving the disagreement between each account of foraging by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques
