Determining the population of Large Meteoroids in Major Meteor Showers

TL;DR

This study estimates the largest meteoroids in major meteor showers from 2019-2022 observations using satellite data, revealing sizes and mass distributions that inform understanding of meteoroid origins and ejection processes.

Contribution

It introduces a novel satellite-based method to estimate meteoroid sizes and masses in major showers, providing new insights into their distribution and origins.

Findings

Largest meteoroids are up to 7 kg for Leonids and 3 kg for Perseids.

Meteoroid mass distributions follow a power-law with specific exponents.

Perseids have larger meteoroids than expected from gas-drag ejection models.

Abstract

We have estimated the largest meteoroids present in major meteor showers from observations conducted between 2019-2022 by the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument on the GOES-R satellites. Our integrated time area products for the Leonids, Perseids and eta Aquariids are of order 5 x 10^10 km2 hours. We compute photometric masses for shower fireballs using the approach of Vojacek et al. 2022 to correct from narrow-band GLM luminosity to bolometric luminosity and apply the luminous efficiency relation of Ceplecha and McCrosky 1976 at high speeds. Between 2019 and 2022, the showers definitely observed by GLM were the Leonids, Perseids, and eta Aquariids, with probable detections of the Orionids and Taurids. We find the largest meteoroids to be of order 7 kg for the Leonids, 3 kg for the Perseids, and 3 kg for the eta Aquariids, corresponding to meteoroids of ~ 0.2m diameter. The Orionids and Taurids had maximum meteoroid masses of 4 kg and 150 kg respectively. The Leonids and eta Aquariids are well fit by a single power-law with differential mass exponent, s, of 2.08 +/- 0.08 and 2.00 +/- 0.09 over the mass range 10^-7 < m < 1 kg. All showers had maximum meteoroid masses compatible with Whipple gas-drag ejection, with the exception of the Perseids which have much larger meteoroids than expected which is also consistent with observations from ground based instruments. This may reflect preferential ejection in narrow jets or possibly some form of mantle erosion/release in the past for the parent comet, 109P/Swift-Tuttle.