Letter to the Editor: What are the legal and ethical considerations of submitting radiology reports to ChatGPT?
Siddharth Agarwal, David Wood, Robin Carpenter, Yiran Wei, Marc Modat,, Thomas C Booth

TL;DR
This letter discusses the ethical and legal issues of using large language models like ChatGPT to process radiology reports, emphasizing data privacy concerns and the need for strict data protection measures.
Contribution
It critically evaluates the ethical and legal considerations of deploying LLMs in radiology, emphasizing data privacy and compliance with regulations.
Findings
Raises concerns about patient data privacy and consent
Highlights the importance of GDPR compliance
Calls for stringent data protection measures
Abstract
This letter critically examines the recent article by Infante et al. assessing the utility of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Perplexity, and Bard in identifying urgent findings in emergency radiology reports. While acknowledging the potential of LLMs in generating labels for computer vision, concerns are raised about the ethical implications of using patient data without explicit approval, highlighting the necessity of stringent data protection measures under GDPR.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Radiology practices and education · Healthcare cost, quality, practices
MethodsAttention Is All You Need · Linear Layer · Multi-Head Attention · Position-Wise Feed-Forward Layer · Dropout · Label Smoothing · Residual Connection · Softmax · Absolute Position Encodings · Byte Pair Encoding
