Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution
David Van Dijcke, Florian Gunsilius, Austin Wright

TL;DR
This study uses large-scale data to analyze how return-to-office policies after COVID-19 impact employee tenure and seniority distribution in major US tech firms, revealing potential risks to firm competitiveness.
Contribution
It introduces a nonparametric, distributional synthetic controls method to quantify the effects of return-to-office policies on employee tenure and seniority distribution.
Findings
Return-to-office policies reduce employee tenure, especially for long-tenure workers.
Senior employees tend to leave for larger competitors, shifting seniority distribution downward.
These shifts may threaten firm productivity and innovation.
Abstract
With the official end of the COVID-19 pandemic, debates about the return to office have taken center stage among companies and employees. Despite their ubiquity, the economic implications of return to office policies are not fully understood. Using 260 million resumes matched to company data, we analyze the causal effects of such policies on employees' tenure and seniority levels at three of the largest US tech companies: Microsoft, SpaceX, and Apple. Our estimation procedure is nonparametric and captures the full heterogeneity of tenure and seniority of employees in a distributional synthetic controls framework. We estimate a reduction in counterfactual tenure that increases for employees with longer tenure. Similarly, we document a leftward shift in the seniority distribution towards positions below the senior level. These shifts appear to be driven by employees leaving to larger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCorporate Finance and Governance · Firm Innovation and Growth · Gender Diversity and Inequality
