Uncovering implementable dormant pruning decisions from three different stakeholder perspectives
Deanna Flynn, Abhinav Jain, Heather Knight, Cristina G. Wilson, and, Cindy Grimm

TL;DR
This study analyzes how horticulturists, growers, and pruners make pruning decisions, extracting heuristics and terminology to inform autonomous robotic pruning systems across different cultivars and tree architectures.
Contribution
It presents three studies capturing stakeholder-specific pruning heuristics and terminology, facilitating robotic automation in orchard pruning tasks.
Findings
Seven pruning heuristics identified for autonomous systems
Validated terminology set for pruning concepts
Three horticultural contexts characterized
Abstract
Dormant pruning, or the removal of unproductive portions of a tree while a tree is not actively growing, is an important orchard task to help maintain yield, requiring years to build expertise. Because of long training periods and an increasing labor shortage in agricultural jobs, pruning could benefit from robotic automation. However, to program robots to prune branches, we first need to understand how pruning decisions are made, and what variables in the environment (e.g., branch size and thickness) we need to capture. Working directly with three pruning stakeholders -- horticulturists, growers, and pruners -- we find that each group of human experts approaches pruning decision-making differently. To capture this knowledge, we present three studies and two extracted pruning protocols from field work conducted in Prosser, Washington in January 2022 and 2023. We interviewed six…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
