The Fault in Our Recommendations: On the Perils of Optimizing the Measurable
Omar Besbes, Yash Kanoria, Akshit Kumar

TL;DR
This paper investigates how optimizing recommendation systems for engagement proxies can lead to utility loss and proposes a utility-aware approach that balances exploration and exploitation for improved overall utility.
Contribution
It introduces a model analyzing the impact of engagement optimization on utility and proposes a new policy that balances popular and niche content to improve utility without sacrificing engagement.
Findings
Optimizing for engagement can cause significant utility loss.
A mixed recommendation policy improves utility and engagement.
Exploration of niche content enhances discovery without reducing engagement.
Abstract
Recommendation systems are widespread, and through customized recommendations, promise to match users with options they will like. To that end, data on engagement is collected and used. Most recommendation systems are ranking-based, where they rank and recommend items based on their predicted engagement. However, the engagement signals are often only a crude proxy for utility, as data on the latter is rarely collected or available. This paper explores the following question: By optimizing for measurable proxies, are recommendation systems at risk of significantly under-delivering on utility? If so, how can one improve utility which is seldom measured? To study these questions, we introduce a model of repeated user consumption in which, at each interaction, users select between an outside option and the best option from a recommendation set. Our model accounts for user heterogeneity,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvaluation and Performance Assessment
