Large Effects of Small Cues: Priming Selfish Economic Decisions
Avichai Snir, Dudi Levy, Dian Wang, Haipeng Allan Chen, and Daniel, Levy

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that small contextual cues can significantly influence economic decision-making, with priming social or market norms affecting both economists and non-economists' choices in social dilemmas.
Contribution
It introduces a novel explanation that differences in economic decisions are driven by contextual interpretation rather than selection or indoctrination effects.
Findings
Priming cues influence profit maximization behavior.
Both groups respond similarly to social norm cues.
Contextual cues explain differences in economic decision-making.
Abstract
Many experimental studies report that economics students tend to act more selfishly than students of other disciplines, a finding that received widespread public and professional attention. Two main explanations that the existing literature offers for the differences found in the behavior between economists and noneconomists are the selection effect, and the indoctrination effect. We offer an alternative, novel explanation. We argue that these differences can be explained by differences in the interpretation of the context. We test this hypothesis by conducting two social dilemma experiments in the US and Israel with participants from both economics and non-economics majors. In the experiments, participants face a tradeoff between profit maximization, that is the market norm and workers welfare, that is the social norm. We use priming to manipulate the cues that the participants receive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
