TL;DR
This study quantifies how observational uncertainties in mass and radius measurements impact the accuracy of inferred exoplanet compositions, providing guidelines for optimal observational strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a method to determine required measurement precisions for constraining exoplanet compositions, considering observational errors and model assumptions.
Findings
Mass and radius errors significantly affect composition estimates.
Specific precision thresholds are identified for different planet types.
An error floor exists due to mineralogical uncertainties.
Abstract
Determining compositions of low-mass exoplanets is essential in understanding their origins. The certainty by which masses and radius are measured affects our ability to discern planets that are rocky or volatile rich. In this study, we aim to determine sound observational strategies to avoid diminishing returns. We quantify how uncertainties in mass, radius and model assumptions propagate into errors in inferred compositions of rocky and water planets. For a target error in a planet's iron-mass fraction or water content, we calculate the corresponding required accuracies in radius and mass. For instance, a rocky planet with a known radius error of 2% (corresponding to TESS detection best errors) demands mass precision to be at 5-11% to attain a 8 wt% precision in iron-mass fraction, regardless of mass. Similarly, a water world of equal radius precision requires 9-20% mass precision to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
