Strategies for Increasing Corporate Responsible AI Prioritization
Angelina Wang, Teresa Datta, John P. Dickerson

TL;DR
This paper explores the motivations and strategies for increasing corporate prioritization of responsible AI through interviews, providing a structured overview of current landscape and potential directions for practitioners.
Contribution
It offers a structured analysis of motivators and strategies for corporate RAI prioritization based on practitioner interviews, highlighting key actors and promising approaches.
Findings
Identifies diverse motivators for RAI prioritization
Classifies available strategies and responsible actors
Suggests promising directions for future efforts
Abstract
Responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) is increasingly recognized as a critical concern. However, the level of corporate RAI prioritization has not kept pace. In this work, we conduct 16 semi-structured interviews with practitioners to investigate what has historically motivated companies to increase the prioritization of RAI. What emerges is a complex story of conflicting and varied factors, but we bring structure to the narrative by highlighting the different strategies available to employ, and point to the actors with access to each. While there are no guaranteed steps for increasing RAI prioritization, we paint the current landscape of motivators so that practitioners can learn from each other, and put forth our own selection of promising directions forward.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBig Data and Business Intelligence · Digital Transformation in Industry · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
