Pretrained Optimization Model for Zero-Shot Black Box Optimization
Xiaobin Li, Kai Wu, Yujian Betterest Li, Xiaoyu Zhang, Handing Wang,, Jing Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Pretrained Optimization Model (POM) that effectively addresses zero-shot black-box optimization by leveraging prior knowledge, outperforming existing methods especially in high-dimensional and diverse tasks.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel pretrained optimization model that generalizes across tasks, dimensions, and horizons, reducing the need for hyperparameter tuning and improving zero-shot optimization performance.
Findings
POM outperforms state-of-the-art methods on BBOB and robot control tasks.
Fine-tuning POM with few samples significantly enhances performance.
POM demonstrates robust generalization across various task settings.
Abstract
Zero-shot optimization involves optimizing a target task that was not seen during training, aiming to provide the optimal solution without or with minimal adjustments to the optimizer. It is crucial to ensure reliable and robust performance in various applications. Current optimizers often struggle with zero-shot optimization and require intricate hyperparameter tuning to adapt to new tasks. To address this, we propose a Pretrained Optimization Model (POM) that leverages knowledge gained from optimizing diverse tasks, offering efficient solutions to zero-shot optimization through direct application or fine-tuning with few-shot samples. Evaluation on the BBOB benchmark and two robot control tasks demonstrates that POM outperforms state-of-the-art black-box optimization methods, especially for high-dimensional tasks. Fine-tuning POM with a small number of samples and budget yields…
Peer Reviews
Decision·NeurIPS 2024 poster
The proposed method performs better than the baselines on the BBOB benchmark and two robotic tasks. **Increased score from 3 to 6 after discussion**
- The paper is missing some key references [1, 2, 3]. These methods learn from diverse tasks and are able to adapt to new tasks without any finetuning. This invalidates some of the claims made in the paper (lines 28-29, line 78) - Section 3 is difficult to read without a background section on population-based optimization. It should describe a general evolutionary algorithm first and how POM parameterizes different components of the algorithm with a neural network. - Section 3.2 is overly mathy
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research · Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
