Axiomatizing the Logic of Ordinary Discourse
Vitor Greati, S\'ergio Marcelino, Umberto Rivieccio

TL;DR
This paper formalizes the three-valued Logic of Ordinary Discourse (OL), exploring its unusual features and providing modular axiomatizations, showing its algebraizability and relation to other three-valued logics.
Contribution
It introduces Hilbert-style calculi for OL and sOL, proves sOL's algebraizability, and establishes its equivalence to an extension of J3 logic, advancing formal understanding of everyday reasoning.
Findings
sOL is algebraizable with a discriminator variety semantics
sOL is definitionally equivalent to an extension of J3 logic
The calculi for OL and sOL are modular and analytic
Abstract
Most non-classical logics are subclassical, that is, every inference/theorem they validate is also valid classically. A notable exception is the three-valued propositional Logic of Ordinary Discourse (OL) proposed and extensively motivated by W. S. Cooper as a more adequate candidate for formalizing everyday reasoning (in English). OL challenges classical logic not only by rejecting some theses, but also by accepting non-classically valid principles, such as so-called Aristotle's and Boethius' theses. Formally, OL shows a number of unusual features - it is non-structural, connexive, paraconsistent and contradictory - making it all the more interesting for the mathematical logician. We present our recent findings on OL and its structural companion (that we call sOL). We introduce Hilbert-style multiple-conclusion calculi for OL and sOL that are both modular and analytic, and easily allow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition
