Statistical Equivalence of Metrics for Meteor Dynamical Association
Eloy Pe\~na-Asensio, Juan Miguel S\'anchez-Lozano

TL;DR
This study compares orbital similarity metrics and machine learning distance measures for meteor association, finding that geocentric features and certain metrics outperform traditional criteria, with implications for meteor shower identification.
Contribution
The paper evaluates and compares traditional D-criteria with machine learning distance metrics, highlighting the superior performance of geocentric features and identifying optimal cut-offs for meteor association.
Findings
sEuclidean metric with GEO vector performs best.
D_SH is the most effective D-criterion, followed by ρ_2.
Geocentric features outperform orbital elements in meteor association.
Abstract
We statistically evaluate and compare four orbital similarity criteria within five-dimensional parameter space (, , , and ) to study dynamical associations using the already classified meteors (manually by a human) in CAMS database as a benchmark. In addition, we assess various distance metrics typically used in Machine Learning with two different vectors: ORBIT, grounded in heliocentric orbital elements, and GEO, predicated on geocentric observational parameters. Additionally, we compute the optimal cut-offs for all methods for distinguishing sporadic background events. Our findings demonstrate the superior performance of the sEuclidean metric in conjunction with the GEO vector. Within the scope of D-criteria, emerged as the preeminent metric, closely followed by . stands out as the most equivalence to the distance metrics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
