Rejoinder on "Marked spatial point processes: current state and extensions to point processes on linear networks"

TL;DR

This paper is a detailed response to discussions on a comprehensive review of marked spatial point processes and their extensions to linear networks, emphasizing clarifications and future directions.

Contribution

It provides a thorough engagement with expert comments on the current state and extensions of spatial point process models on linear networks.

Findings

Clarified key points from the original review.

Identified future research directions.

Addressed specific discussant questions.

Abstract

We are grateful to all discussants for their invaluable comments, suggestions, questions, and contributions to our article. We have attentively reviewed all discussions with keen interest. In this rejoinder, our objective is to address and engage with all points raised by the discussants in a comprehensive and considerate manner. Consistently, we identify the discussants, in alphabetical order, as follows: CJK for Cronie, Jansson, and Konstantinou, DS for Stoyan, GP for Grabarnik and Pommerening, MRS for Myllym\"aki, Rajala, and S\"arkk\"a, and MCvL for van Lieshout throughout this rejoinder.