Metalearners for Ranking Treatment Effects
Toon Vanderschueren, Wouter Verbeke, Felipe Moraes, Hugo Manuel, Proen\c{c}a

TL;DR
This paper introduces a ranking-based approach for treatment effect allocation that directly optimizes profit under budget constraints, addressing limitations of traditional causal effect estimation methods.
Contribution
It proposes a novel learning-to-rank methodology for treatment allocation that aligns predictions with operational profit maximization, scalable to large datasets.
Findings
The ranking approach maximizes the area under the profit curve.
Empirical validation shows improved allocation performance.
The method scales efficiently to large datasets.
Abstract
Efficiently allocating treatments with a budget constraint constitutes an important challenge across various domains. In marketing, for example, the use of promotions to target potential customers and boost conversions is limited by the available budget. While much research focuses on estimating causal effects, there is relatively limited work on learning to allocate treatments while considering the operational context. Existing methods for uplift modeling or causal inference primarily estimate treatment effects, without considering how this relates to a profit maximizing allocation policy that respects budget constraints. The potential downside of using these methods is that the resulting predictive model is not aligned with the operational context. Therefore, prediction errors are propagated to the optimization of the budget allocation problem, subsequently leading to a suboptimal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
MethodsCausal inference
