The role of LRG1 and LRG2's monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology
Zhengyi Wang, Shijie Lin, Zhejie Ding, Bin Hu

TL;DR
This paper investigates how monopole components of LRG1 and LRG2 influence the divergence of DESI 2024 BAO cosmology results from Planck data, suggesting their monopoles favor thawing dark energy models.
Contribution
It introduces a new analysis focusing on monopole components of LRG1 and LRG2, revealing their significant role in cosmological parameter deviations from Planck results.
Findings
Removing LRG2's $D_V$$ aligns DESI+ CMB+ SNIa with $w=-1$ within 2$\sigma$
Excluding LRG1's $D_V$ shifts $w_0/w_a$ toward $w=-1$
Both LRG1 and LRG2 monopoles favor thawing dark energy, especially LRG2.
Abstract
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration recently released its first year of data (DR1) on baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in galaxy, quasar, and Lyman- forest tracers. When combined with CMB and SNIa data, DESI BAO results suggest potential thawing behavior in dark energy. Cosmological analyses utilize comoving distances along () and perpendicular to () the line of sight. Notably, there are deviations in and from Planck cosmology values in the luminous red galaxies (LRG) bins LRG1 and LRG2.This study examines the role of LRG1 and LRG2 in diverging DESI 2024 BAO cosmology from Planck cosmology. We use angle-averaged distance and the ratio , which are more directly related to the measured monopole and quadrupole components of the galaxy power spectrum or correlation function, instead of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
