Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvement
Tian Xie, Xuwei Tan, Xueru Zhang

TL;DR
This paper models strategic human behavior in algorithmic decision-making, focusing on persistent effort improvements and how decision-makers can incentivize optimal, honest efforts in dynamic, potentially dishonest environments.
Contribution
It introduces a dynamic model with persistent improvements, analyzes equilibrium strategies, and designs optimal policies to incentivize honest, sustained efforts in strategic agents.
Findings
Agents have incentives to improve under certain conditions.
Optimal policies can incentivize maximum improvements.
Honest efforts are favored when incentives are properly aligned.
Abstract
This paper studies algorithmic decision-making under human's strategic behavior, where a decision maker uses an algorithm to make decisions about human agents, and the latter with information about the algorithm may exert effort strategically and improve to receive favorable decisions. Unlike prior works that assume agents benefit from their efforts immediately, we consider realistic scenarios where the impacts of these efforts are persistent and agents benefit from efforts by making improvements gradually. We first develop a dynamic model to characterize persistent improvements and based on this construct a Stackelberg game to model the interplay between agents and the decision-maker. We analytically characterize the equilibrium strategies and identify conditions under which agents have incentives to improve. With the dynamics, we then study how the decision-maker can design an optimal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
