LineBreaker: Finding Token-Inconsistency Bugs with Large Language Models

TL;DR

This paper introduces LineBreaker, a cascaded detection system that leverages large language models and smaller, efficient models to identify token-inconsistency bugs in code, improving detection precision, recall, and scalability.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel cascaded approach combining LLMs and smaller models for effective token-inconsistency bug detection, addressing limitations of existing methods.

Findings

GPT-4 shows promise but has limitations in precision and scalability.

LineBreaker uncovers 123 new bugs in real-world repositories.

41 out of 69 proposed fixes have been confirmed or merged.

Abstract

Token-inconsistency bugs (TIBs) involve the misuse of syntactically valid yet incorrect code tokens, such as misused variables and erroneous function invocations, which can often lead to software bugs. Unlike simple syntactic bugs, TIBs occur at the semantic level and are subtle - sometimes they remain undetected for years. Traditional detection methods, such as static analysis and dynamic testing, often struggle with TIBs due to their versatile and context-dependent nature. However, advancements in large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 present new opportunities for automating TIB detection by leveraging these models' semantic understanding capabilities. This paper reports the first systematic measurement of LLMs' capabilities in detecting TIBs, revealing that while GPT-4 shows promise, it exhibits limitations in precision and scalability. Specifically, its detection capability is undermined by the model's tendency to focus on the code snippets that do not contain TIBs; its scalability concern arises from GPT-4's high cost and the massive amount of code requiring inspection. To address these challenges, we introduce \name, a novel and cascaded TIB detection system. \name leverages smaller, code-specific, and highly efficient language models to filter out large numbers of code snippets unlikely to contain TIBs, thereby significantly enhancing the system's performance in terms of precision, recall, and scalability. We evaluated \name on 154 Python and C GitHub repositories, each with over 1,000 stars, uncovering 123 new flaws, 45\% of which could be exploited to disrupt program functionalities. Out of our 69 submitted fixes, 41 have already been confirmed or merged.