Automating the Analysis of Public Saliency and Attitudes towards Biodiversity from Digital Media

TL;DR

This paper presents an automated NLP-based methodology for analyzing public attitudes towards biodiversity from digital media, addressing challenges in data relevance, bias, and scale, demonstrated through a COVID-19 case study on mammal taxa.

Contribution

It introduces a folk taxonomy search approach, relevance filtering pipeline using unsupervised learning and zero-shot LLMs, enabling scalable and unbiased biodiversity attitude analysis.

Findings

Up to 62% irrelevant articles filtered out during data collection.

Detected increased volume and sentiment shift towards bats during COVID-19.

Methodology facilitates use of modern NLP tools for conservation-related public perception analysis.

Abstract

Measuring public attitudes toward wildlife provides crucial insights into our relationship with nature and helps monitor progress toward Global Biodiversity Framework targets. Yet, conducting such assessments at a global scale is challenging. Manually curating search terms for querying news and social media is tedious, costly, and can lead to biased results. Raw news and social media data returned from queries are often cluttered with irrelevant content and syndicated articles. We aim to overcome these challenges by leveraging modern Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools. We introduce a folk taxonomy approach for improved search term generation and employ cosine similarity on Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency vectors to filter syndicated articles. We also introduce an extensible relevance filtering pipeline which uses unsupervised learning to reveal common topics, followed by an open-source zero-shot Large Language Model (LLM) to assign topics to news article titles, which are then used to assign relevance. Finally, we conduct sentiment, topic, and volume analyses on resulting data. We illustrate our methodology with a case study of news and X (formerly Twitter) data before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for various mammal taxa, including bats, pangolins, elephants, and gorillas. During the data collection period, up to 62% of articles including keywords pertaining to bats were deemed irrelevant to biodiversity, underscoring the importance of relevance filtering. At the pandemic's onset, we observed increased volume and a significant sentiment shift toward horseshoe bats, which were implicated in the pandemic, but not for other focal taxa. The proposed methods open the door to conservation practitioners applying modern and emerging NLP tools, including LLMs "out of the box," to analyze public perceptions of biodiversity during current events or campaigns.