
TL;DR
This paper adapts Data Feminism principles to AI, emphasizing intersectional, ethical, and sustainable practices to address power imbalances, prevent harms, and promote equity in AI research and deployment.
Contribution
It rearticulates Data Feminism principles for AI, introduces two new principles on environmental impact and consent, and provides a framework for equitable AI development.
Findings
Feminist principles can guide ethical AI research.
New principles address environmental sustainability and consent.
Framework helps identify and mitigate AI harms.
Abstract
This paper presents a set of intersectional feminist principles for conducting equitable, ethical, and sustainable AI research. In Data Feminism (2020), we offered seven principles for examining and challenging unequal power in data science. Here, we present a rationale for why feminism remains deeply relevant for AI research, rearticulate the original principles of data feminism with respect to AI, and introduce two potential new principles related to environmental impact and consent. Together, these principles help to 1) account for the unequal, undemocratic, extractive, and exclusionary forces at work in AI research, development, and deployment; 2) identify and mitigate predictable harms in advance of unsafe, discriminatory, or otherwise oppressive systems being released into the world; and 3) inspire creative, joyful, and collective ways to work towards a more equitable, sustainable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
