Public Computing Intellectuals in the Age of AI Crisis
Randy Connolly

TL;DR
This paper discusses the social implications of AI, advocates for reflexive and public-oriented computing practices, and suggests pedagogical reforms to foster critical engagement and societal responsibility in the discipline.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of Public Computer Intellectuals, emphasizing reflexive practice and public engagement as essential components of modern computing discipline.
Findings
Highlights the social risks of AI development
Proposes integrating reflexive and public functions into computing practice
Recommends pedagogical changes to foster critical and societal awareness
Abstract
The belief that AI technology is on the cusp of causing a generalized social crisis became a popular one in 2023. While there was no doubt an element of hype and exaggeration to some of these accounts, they do reflect the fact that there are troubling ramifications to this technology stack. This conjunction of shared concerns about social, political, and personal futures presaged by current developments in artificial intelligence presents the academic discipline of computing with a renewed opportunity for self-examination and reconfiguration. This position paper endeavors to do so in four sections. The first explores what is at stake for computing in the narrative of an AI crisis. The second articulates possible educational responses to this crisis and advocates for a broader analytic focus on power relations. The third section presents a novel characterization of academic computing's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
