Uncovering What, Why and How: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causation Understanding of Video Anomaly
Hang Du, Sicheng Zhang, Binzhu Xie, Guoshun Nan, Jiayang Zhang, Junrui Xu, Hangyu Liu, Sicong Leng, Jiangming Liu, Hehe Fan, Dajiu Huang, Jing Feng, Linli Chen, Can Zhang, Xuhuan Li, Hao Zhang, Jianhang Chen, Qimei Cui, Xiaofeng Tao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark and evaluation metric for understanding the causes, reasons, and severity of video anomalies, advancing beyond detection to explainability.
Contribution
It presents the CUVA benchmark with detailed annotations for anomaly type, cause, and effect, along with MMEval, a new metric for assessing causation understanding in videos.
Findings
The MMEval metric better aligns with human judgment.
The prompt-based approach outperforms existing methods.
The dataset enables detailed causation analysis of video anomalies.
Abstract
Video anomaly understanding (VAU) aims to automatically comprehend unusual occurrences in videos, thereby enabling various applications such as traffic surveillance and industrial manufacturing. While existing VAU benchmarks primarily concentrate on anomaly detection and localization, our focus is on more practicality, prompting us to raise the following crucial questions: "what anomaly occurred?", "why did it happen?", and "how severe is this abnormal event?". In pursuit of these answers, we present a comprehensive benchmark for Causation Understanding of Video Anomaly (CUVA). Specifically, each instance of the proposed benchmark involves three sets of human annotations to indicate the "what", "why" and "how" of an anomaly, including 1) anomaly type, start and end times, and event descriptions, 2) natural language explanations for the cause of an anomaly, and 3) free text reflecting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
