A deconstruction of methods to derive one-point lensing statistics
Viviane Alfradique, Tiago Castro, Valerio Marra, Miguel Quartin, Carlo, Giocoli, Pierluigi Monaco

TL;DR
This paper compares approximate methods for deriving lensing statistics, finding they work well for mild lensing but lose accuracy in strong lensing regimes, informing future gravitational lensing studies.
Contribution
It evaluates the effectiveness of PINOCCHIO and turboGL methods for lensing PDFs across regimes, highlighting their limitations and accuracy in weak lensing scenarios.
Findings
Effective for mild lensing applications
Break down in strong lensing regimes due to nonlinear effects
PINOCCHIO's moments are 6-10% smaller than N-body simulations
Abstract
Gravitational lensing is a crucial tool for exploring cosmic phenomena, providing insights into galaxy clustering, dark matter, and dark energy. Given the substantial computational demands of -body simulations, approximate methods like and have been proposed as viable alternatives for simulating lensing probability density functions (PDFs). This paper evaluates these methods and their effectiveness across both weak and strong lensing regimes, with a focus in the context where baryonic effects are negligible. Our comparative analysis reveals that these methods are effective for applications where lensing is mild, such as the majority of sources of electromagnetic and gravitational waves. However, both and break down for large values of convergence and magnification due to their loss of accuracy in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
