A new understanding on the history of developing MRI for cancer detection
Donald C. Chang

TL;DR
This paper reviews the historical development of MRI technology for cancer detection, revealing that multiple research groups contributed significantly over 50 years, beyond the disputes between two prominent scientists.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive historical analysis showing the collaborative nature of MRI development, challenging previous narratives centered on two key figures.
Findings
Multiple research groups contributed to MRI development.
The development process was collaborative and multifaceted.
Historical claims about key contributors are clarified.
Abstract
Science is about facts and truth. Yet sometimes the truth and facts are not obvious. For example, in the field of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), there has been a long-lasting debate about who were the major contributors in its development. Particularly, there was a strong dispute between the followers of two scientists, R. Damadian and P. Lauterbur. In this review, we carefully trace the major developments in applying NMR for cancer detection starting almost 50 years ago. The research records show that the truth was beyond the claims of either research camps. The development of NMR for cancer detection involved multiple research groups, who made critical contributions at different junctures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
