Almost Envy-Freeness under Weakly Lexicographic Preferences
Hadi Hosseini, Aghaheybat Mammadov, Tomasz W\k{a}s

TL;DR
This paper explores fair division under weakly lexicographic preferences, introducing algorithms for envy-freeness and efficiency, and addressing challenges in both goods and chores scenarios with indifferences.
Contribution
It extends fair division algorithms to weakly lexicographic preferences, handling ties and providing solutions for envy-freeness and Pareto optimality in complex settings.
Findings
Developed an algorithm guaranteeing EF1, EFX, MMS, or their combinations with PO for goods.
Proposed techniques like preference graphs and potential envy for ties.
Established an EF1 and PO algorithm for chores-only instances.
Abstract
In fair division of indivisible items, domain restriction has played a key role in escaping from negative results and providing structural insights into the computational and axiomatic boundaries of fairness. One notable subdomain of additive preferences, the lexicographic domain, has yielded several positive results in dealing with goods, chores, and mixtures thereof. However, the majority of work within this domain primarily consider strict linear orders over items, which do not allow the modeling of more expressive preferences that contain indifferences (ties). We investigate the most prominent fairness notions of envy-freeness up to any (EFX) or some (EF1) item under weakly lexicographic preferences. For the goods-only setting, we develop an algorithm that can be customized to guarantee EF1, EFX, maximin share (MMS), or a combination thereof, along the efficiency notion of Pareto…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Game Theory and Applications · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
