War Elephants: Rethinking Combat AI and Human Oversight
Philip Feldman, Aaron Dant, Harry Dreany

TL;DR
This paper proposes a complementary human-AI team approach for managing autonomous weapons, emphasizing ethical, flexible, and dynamic control to improve battlefield performance and oversight.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework combining human and AI operators for managing lethal autonomous systems based on principles of complementation.
Findings
Enhanced ethical oversight through human-AI teaming
Improved adaptability in dynamic battlefield conditions
Potential for more responsible autonomous weapon operation
Abstract
This paper explores the changes that pervasive AI is having on the nature of combat. We look beyond the substitution of AI for experts to an approach where complementary human and machine abilities are blended. Using historical and modern examples, we show how autonomous weapons systems can be effectively managed by teams of human "AI Operators" combined with AI/ML "Proxy Operators." By basing our approach on the principles of complementation, we provide for a flexible and dynamic approach to managing lethal autonomous systems. We conclude by presenting a path to achieving an integrated vision of machine-speed combat where the battlefield AI is operated by AI Operators that watch for patterns of behavior within battlefield to assess the performance of lethal autonomous systems. This approach enables the development of combat systems that are likely to be more ethical, operate at machine…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
