Evaluating Telugu Proficiency in Large Language Models_ A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini
Katikela Sreeharsha Kishore, Rahimanuddin Shaik

TL;DR
This study compares the Telugu language proficiency of ChatGPT and Gemini LLMs through a set of 20 questions, assessing their grammatical, vocabulary, and reasoning skills to evaluate their suitability for Telugu language tasks.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of Telugu capabilities in ChatGPT and Gemini, highlighting strengths and weaknesses in handling grammar, vocabulary, and reasoning in Telugu.
Findings
ChatGPT shows better grammatical understanding
Gemini has a broader Telugu vocabulary
Both models exhibit limitations in complex reasoning
Abstract
The growing prominence of large language models (LLMs) necessitates the exploration of their capabilities beyond English. This research investigates the Telugu language proficiency of ChatGPT and Gemini, two leading LLMs. Through a designed set of 20 questions encompassing greetings, grammar, vocabulary, common phrases, task completion, and situational reasoning, the study delves into their strengths and weaknesses in handling Telugu. The analysis aims to identify the LLM that demonstrates a deeper understanding of Telugu grammatical structures, possesses a broader vocabulary, and exhibits superior performance in tasks like writing and reasoning. By comparing their ability to comprehend and use everyday Telugu expressions, the research sheds light on their suitability for real-world language interaction. Furthermore, the evaluation of adaptability and reasoning capabilities provides…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsText Readability and Simplification · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Topic Modeling
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
