MAGAZ3NE: Massive, Extremely Dusty Galaxies at $z\sim2$ Lead to Photometric Overestimation of Number Densities of the Most Massive Galaxies at $3<z<4$
Ben Forrest, M. C. Cooper, Adam Muzzin, Gillian Wilson, Danilo Marchesini, Ian McConachie, Percy Gomez, Marianna Annunziatella, Z. Cemile Marsan, Joey Braspenning, Wenjun Chang, Gabriella de Lucia, Fabio Fontanot, Michaela Hirschmann, Dylan Nelson, Annalisa Pillepich

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopic data to show that many candidate ultramassive galaxies at high redshift are actually dust-obscured or lower-redshift interlopers, which affects estimates of galaxy number densities in the early universe.
Contribution
The paper provides spectroscopic evidence that red, dusty galaxies contaminate high-redshift galaxy samples, leading to overestimated number densities in photometric surveys.
Findings
Many high-redshift candidates are dust-obscured galaxies at lower redshifts.
Photometric redshifts often misclassify dusty interlopers as high-z galaxies.
Correcting for these interlopers aligns observed galaxy densities with cosmological models.
Abstract
We present rest-frame optical spectra from Keck/MOSFIRE and Keck/NIRES of 16 candidate ultramassive galaxies targeted as part of the Massive Ancient Galaxies at Near-Infrared (MAGAZ3NE) Survey. These candidates were selected to have photometric redshifts , photometric stellar masses log(/M), and well-sampled photometric spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from the UltraVISTA and VIDEO surveys. In contrast to previous spectroscopic observations of blue star-forming and post-starburst ultramassive galaxies, candidates in this sample have very red SEDs implying significant dust attenuation, old stellar ages, and/or active galactic nuclei (AGN). Of these galaxies, eight are revealed to be heavily dust-obscured galaxies with strong emission lines, some showing broad features indicative of AGN, three are Type I AGN hosts at ,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistics Education and Methodologies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
