Excitation mechanisms of C II optical permitted lines in ionized nebulae

TL;DR

This study investigates the excitation mechanisms of CII optical lines in ionized nebulae, clarifying which lines are reliable for abundance measurements and addressing the longstanding abundance discrepancy problem.

Contribution

It identifies which CII lines are purely recombination lines and confirms the atomic data accuracy, helping to resolve the abundance discrepancy in nebular studies.

Findings

Certain CII lines are purely recombination lines with no fluorescence influence.

The abundance discrepancy is due to physical phenomena like temperature variations, not fluorescence or atomic data errors.

Some CII lines are affected by fluorescence and are unsuitable for abundance determinations.

Abstract

Context. Carbon is the fourth most abundant element in the universe and its distribution is critical to understanding stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis. In optical studies of ionized nebulae, the only way to determine the C/H abundance is by using faint CII recombination lines (RLs). However, these lines give systematically higher abundances than their collisionally excited counterparts, observable at ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths. Therefore, a proper understanding of the excitation mechanisms of the faint permitted lines is crucial for addressing this long-standing abundance discrepancy (AD) problem. Aims. In this study, we investigate the excitation mechanisms of CII lines {\lambda}{\lambda}3918, 3920, 4267, 5342, 6151, 6462, 7231, 7236, 7237 and 9903. Methods. We use the DEep Spectra of Ionized REgions Database (DESIRED) that contains spectra of HII regions, planetary nebulae and other objects to analyze the fluorescence contributions to these lines and the accuracy of the atomic recombination data used to model the C+ ion. Results. We find that CII {\lambda}{\lambda}4267, 5342, 6151, 6462 and 9903 arise exclusively from recombinations with no fluorescent contributions. In addition, the recombination theory for these lines is consistent with the observations. Our findings show that the AD problem for C2+ is not due to fluorescence in the widely used CII lines or errors in their atomic parameters, but to other phenomena like temperature variations or chemical inhomogeneities. On the other hand, CII {\lambda}{\lambda}3918, 3920, 6578, 7231, 7236, 7237 have important fluorescent contributions, which are inadvisable for tracing the C2+ abundances. We also discuss the effects of possible inconsistencies in the atomic effective recombination coefficients of CII {\lambda}{\lambda}6578, 7231, 7236 and 7237.