A Review of the Accuracy of Direct Numerical Simulation Tools for the Simulation of Non-Spherical Bubble Collapses
Mandeep Saini, Lucas Prouvost, Stephane Popinet, Daniel Fuster

TL;DR
This paper reviews the accuracy of direct numerical simulation tools for non-spherical bubble collapse, providing a theoretical analysis that generalizes existing models and identifies key parameters influencing simulation precision.
Contribution
It introduces a new theoretical framework for assessing numerical errors in non-spherical bubble collapse simulations, emphasizing the ratio of grid size to minimum radius.
Findings
The grid size to minimum radius ratio scales numerical errors.
A generalized theory predicts peak pressures during bubble collapse.
Simulation accuracy depends on specific initial conditions.
Abstract
Numerical methods for the simulation of cavitation processes have been developed for more than 50 years. The rich variety of physical phenomena triggered by the collapse of a bubble has several applications in medicine and environmental science but requires the development of sophisticated numerical methods able to capture the presence of sharp interfaces between fluids and solid/elastic materials, the generation of shock waves and the development of non-spherical modes. One important challenge faced by numerical methods is the important temporal and scale separation inherent to the process of bubble collapse, where many effects become predominant during very short time lapses around the instant of minimum radius when the simulations are hardly resolved. In this manuscript, we provide a detailed discussion of the parameters controlling the accuracy of direct numerical simulation in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
